新的内侧颞叶萎缩筛查阈值手册介绍
- 1 Abstract
- 2 Background
- 3 Methods
- 3.1 Subjects
- 3.2 MRI technique
- 3.3 MRI readings
- 3.4 Study approval
- 4 Results
- 4.1 Demographic and neuropsychological variables
- 4.2 Influence of demographic and neuropsychological test on the visual rating scales
- 4.3 Cutoff scores and diagnostic value of visual rating scale for discriminating DAT for NC
- 4.4 Visual rating scale for discriminating aMCI from NC
- 5 Discussion
- 6 Limitation
- 7 Conclusion
- 8 Abbreviations
- 9 Acknowledgements
- 10 Funding
- 11 Availability of data and materials
- 12 Author
- 13 Ethics approval and consent to participate
- 14 Consent for publication
- 15 Competing interests
- 16 Publisher
- 17 Author details
- 18 References
新的内侧颞叶萎缩筛查阈值
- 2019-08-18 13:51:24
- admin
- 1887
- 最后编辑：ADC秘书处 于 2019-11-07 09:52:23
NC, the MTA showed highest diagnostic value than other scales, and when the cutoff score of 1.5 of MTA scale, it
obtained an optimal sensitivity (84.5%) and specificity (79.1%) respectively, with a 15.5% of false negative rate.
Cutoff scores and diagnostic values were calculated stratified by age. For the age ranges 50–64, 65–74, 75–84 years,
the following cut-offs of MTA should be used, ≥1.0(sensitivity and specificity were 92.3 and 68.4%), ≥1.5(sensitivity
and specificity were 90.4 and 85.2%), ≥ 2.0(sensitivity and specificity were 70.8 and 82.3%) respectively. All of the
scales showed relatively lower diagnostic values for discriminating aMCI from NC.
发表评论
版权声明
本网所有内容文字、图片和音视频资料，版权均属ADC网站所有，任何媒体、网站或个人未经本网协议授权不得转载、链接、转贴或以其他方式复制发布/发表。
已经本网协议授权的媒体、网站，在下载、转载或引用使用时必须注明"稿件来源：中国老年保健协会阿尔茨海默病协会网"，并标明ADC网址www.adc.org.cn，违者ADC将依法追究责任。
转载或引用本网中的署名文章，请按规定向作者支付稿酬。
